Project Lifecycle Status | Implementation |
Product value score | 5 |
Business Priority (Optional) | Habit |
Values | Pursuit of Truth, Accessibility, Public Service |
State your hypothesis, tying your project back to the impact it might have.
Implementing user-facing categorization on the homepage will result in improved user engagement and satisfaction by providing easier access to relevant content. By organizing content into user-friendly categories, users will spend less time searching for specific topics, leading to increased time spent on the site and higher likelihood of return visits. This project will support business goals such as audience growth, engagement, and retention by enhancing the website's usability and relevance to users' interests. |
|
Which metrics would you use to track the success of this project? We will use this as the foundation of our experiment design. (Optional)
|
|
What problem are we trying to solve for our communities with this experiment? How might it help us better serve them?
Without user-facing categorization on the homepage, users may struggle to navigate through the available content to discover what interests them. This can lead to frustration, decreased engagement, and potentially a higher likelihood of users leaving the site without exploring its full offerings. By implementing user-facing categorization on the homepage, we aim to improve the content discovery process to better inform and serve audiences. |
|
Lay out the potential project steps to the best of your ability, including key teams that would need to be consulted. This is your best knowledge of the systems, tools and lift that would be required.
UX audit: Audit the homepage's usability together using group exercise materials. Design user-friendly interface: Ensure user-friendly blocks for displaying decided public-facing topic labels. Establish testing parameters: Outline the metrics we will use to determine the effectiveness of the new blocks. Implement homepage layout changes: Update the homepage layout to accommodate the new categorization features in sandbox. Train content creators and create communication plan: Provide training and guidance to content creators on how to use the new categorization feature effectively, including best practices for tagging content and maintaining consistency across categories. Launch and monitor performance: Launch the updated homepage with user-facing categorization features and monitor its performance using KPIs such as time spent on page, engagement metrics, and user feedback. Target date = August 27. Test and iterate: Conduct usability testing and gather feedback from users to identify any issues or areas for improvement in the categorization feature, making necessary adjustments and refinements based on user feedback. Testing Phase (4-9 Weeks)
|
|
Effort (scale of 1-lowest to 4-highest) | 1 |
Urgency (scale of 1-lowest to 4-highest) | 2 |
Business Impact (scale of 1-lowest to 4-highest) | 3 |
Cost (scale of 1-lowest to 4-highest) | 1 |
Alignment with Values (scale of 1-lowest to 4-highest) | 3 |
Close to every day, the section of the homepage now labeled "Watch & Listen" has a story that does not include video or audio. Historically, the area of the page was used to highlight both multimedia (stuff to watch or listen to) as well as enterprise with a long tail, or less newsy stories like Superabundant that might not fit higher up on the page on very newsy day. The new label doesn't fit that historic use, and the way the page is being curated does not match the label.
It feels like it might be worth inviting multiple digital producers in to weigh in on the label, since they spend hours a day curating the homepage and likely have a strong instinct for the range of content we have? I think it's possible that a slightly different label could be all we need, too. Attached, a screenshot of the curation that prompted this note today. (But I've seen this at least 4-5 times a week since we changed the label on the homepage).
Retrospective: